mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 4.23RC3 & SSL Tunnels
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:23:05 -0600
Thomas Buchanan wrote:
Kris Katterjohn writes:
> What about something general like this:
> <library name="openssl" version="[version]" />
> <library name="libpcap" version="[version]" />
> <library name="libpcre" version="[version]" />
> <!-- etc -->
Fine by me.
How does the attached patch (against SVN r6441) look? It prints the
library versions for libpcap, libpcre, liblua (if included) and openssl
Some questions that I had:
1. Where should the output go in the XML file? I put it right after
the verbosity / debugging information.
That seems fine to me, because there's not really a great place for it
to go :)
2. What level of verbosity / debugging should be required to include
this information? The patch reflects my opinion that it should be
included at debugging >=1.
AFAIK, in general, things are printed in the XML output independent of
whether verbosity/debugging is enabled (unlike normal output which is
completely controlled by this).
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://SecLists.Org