-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eddie Bell wrote:
> I think this will be really useful once it's implemented. Personally I
> prefer the luadoc syntax because it's so much cleaner.
>
> The problem with the global approach is that each variable name must
> be unique and therefore there is no 'consistent' interface which
> burdens the programmer with remembering his/her nomenclature. Even if
> the nomenclature is standardised, IMHO, it still comes off as rather
> messy.
>
I prefer the LuaDoc syntax as well. Besides seeming more natural and
better in its own right, it also has the advantage of anybody already
familiar with LuaDoc not having to learn another format.
> thanks
> - eddie
>
>> -Patrick Donnelly
>>
Thanks,
Kris Katterjohn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=STst
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on May 11 2008
Intro
