> If this is a one-off scan never to be repeated then it doesn't matter
> much, just pick one of the extremes and go for it. If this is
> something you do all the time it should be easy to hack together a
> perl/python/other script to make a few measurements, a list of
> host:port pairs and do the splitting and scanning for you.
I think it would be fairly simple to hack together a perl/python/ruby/etc
script that would generate a list of nmap commands to run. Suppose your
script took some crazy format input file and output nmap commands:
$ cat host_port_pairs.txt | ./nmap-aggregator.py | sh
That'd get you somewhere close. You could then write another script
that you pipe the output to that would read in a bunch of xml output and
aggregate it into a single output format. It's hacky, but it would end
up giving you fairly nice results. You could some up with a fairly
simple heuristic for your script like "any set of hosts with n ports in
common should be scanned together". You could then try tweaking n and
come up with an experimental value that works well for you.
Just my two cents.
Benson
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on May 14 2008