I'd like to suggest picking a user-agent and sticking with it unless
it's specifically overridden. There are a lot of people out there
breaking the HTTP protocol, and I don't see any reason for nmap to be
one of them. Specifying a user-agent on the command line or
specifically in a script is one thing, but I'd like to see the "right"
user-agent unless it's explicitly asked that we not. Web servers may
provide different results based on user-agent, so I think picking random
ones would lead to nondeterministic scan results, which seems like a bad
plan to me. Does that sound reasonable?
Benson
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:37:41AM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> > What about adding a function to the HTTP library to return a random user
> > agent? There can be a table of, say, 8-10 user agents ranging from IE to
> > Firefox to Opera and with different OS's in the information. And maybe a
> > generic name can be passed to the function to grab a specific browser's
> > user-agent data, like http.get_user_agent("Firefox") (although maybe that's
> > going overboard).
> >
> > Then the HTTP library can use it, and anybody else using HTTP, but not the
> > library, can get it too.
> >
>
> Wow, that sounded really stupid :) I meant to say anybody not using the
> library to build/send the HTTP data, like my HTTPtrace.nse for instance.
>
> Thanks,
> Kris Katterjohn
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQIVAwUBSD+Sov9K37xXYl36AQKKjhAAtouKujtBJQXdnB2TFlSP/7riTPidc2O8
> R4TIDzvM0Mvs378R3be0SrUODk2UcslE8wX6Twz3OwHAQT3dHv8D+gt1VGV0Tedv
> 1ZD0HqdiH+5x1N++/6fzQ6iQdULirVB38lJYOq9p12cYthb/SxevI0i/CJy9knwi
> 4melOuYIUkpXQnMFupjXgjfU/0E2JnhlGUFodAKd8bt54t72wuZz4epYiKTboG9k
> 7za/PuJ3DBgxaz9CfpabCnYidXnpBWAybVztRLIyfxKJofiN7rwO4zJ2lHGVYYJC
> 0EBaKX8uljUvrQKhJ8yEhCMFYcmz4eTYeETxWrw0DGOuIZSJpll1G1TnIX3KeDhv
> N76SqJYRXmbqYa73LVIXGTPzPgFa20JWUfEZlb9fwo/Ut3Vqq7/8kCJFJAjNrXjj
> +wZT46BBhgNANqf4/nFsVgtB0eZZnAqcPlz0DqXA9D2bw8qJm/Sgzs6TykQq0Ln4
> 2nyJ00SJvK8iJYt7Ub+0j4BCt++tXsluP5HKvIRsvwZS/4GCptIl2X4uXffrk0Rv
> xPG3AAbkjnF2R/xoA7bj1o4smwNCCtevfA7gIIvXQG6HtHsKPHt16fYFiontQDLQ
> 3jS+TZMHKRsemG3+1pXcl6y8hOgww7LC5mIxNnjZZN/X3B1nbrgySVIwdq0K2PuV
> ZfUd9q8FTRc=
> =Zka9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
>
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on May 29 2008