Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please)

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:01 AM, jah <jah_at_zadkiel.plus.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that. With this in mind then, if I want to lock an object other
> than "id" using nmap.mutex (allowing threads to run until they reach a point
> where they need to use that object) then that object will need to be one
> which is shared by all threads and thus available in either nmap.registry or
> _G. Is that correct?

Yes.

Cheers,

-- 
-Patrick Donnelly
"One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing
to do and always a clever thing to say."
-Will Durant
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org