mailing list archives
Re: nmap-service-probes matching questions
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:10:45 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
doug () hcsw org wrote:
o Is it better to combine matches like I have done with the first two
sets when the difference is small? Only one word is different between
Yes, using alternation (abc|def) is fine and is a good idea if the services
are very similar. Thanks for noticing this in the eggdrop match lines.
However, there is a small problem with this line and the last one in your
patch. If you're using the | as the regexp delimiter, you can't use
alternation because it will interfere with the reading of the regexp.
In such a case, I usually use / or = as the delimiter. For example:
match login m=^\x01Permission denied ?: Error (35|0|1)\r?\n?$= p/Tru64 Unix logind/ o/Tru64 UNIX/
If m|...(35|0|1)...| was used, this line would be broken.
D'oh! I knew that, I just wasn't thinking. Thanks.
At least I was 1-for-3 :)
o In the third one, is this how it is done to capture the substrings and
to have them match correctly? What are the $N values for these? This
is what it seems like it would be (excluding $1 and $2 which I didn't
$3 is the outer () capture, which is either "posting ok" or "no posting"
depending on the match
$4 is the first inner () capture, which is "posting ok"
$5 is the second inner () capture, which is "no posting"
Is this correct?
Yes, this is how nested capturing work. If you only want to use alternation
without capture, use ?:, for example: (?:GET|POST). This is slightly more
efficient and also you don't need holes in your numbering ie p/$1/ v/$2/ h/$4/.
Also, keep in mind that (abc|def)? WILL capture a group even if the empty string
matches this regexp component. In other words, this is the same as (abc|def|).
Don't even ask about (abc|def)*. :)
Okay, cool, I didn't know about ?:. I was just basing this off of the
winshell matchline (currently line 2525).
In your example here:
match nntp m|^20. ([-.\w]+) InterNetNews NNRP server INN (\d[-.\w ]+) ready \(((posting ok)|(no posting))\)\.\r\n|
p/InterNetNews (INN)/ h/$1/ v/$2/ i/$3/
I see no reason for nested capture. Why not simply (posting ok|no posting) ?
(And make sure you use a different regexp delim than | as described above).
I assumed that the alternation would occur around "ok" and "no" rather
than the sets of words because of the spacing.
I guess I should just research the regex semantics I don't use instead
of mailing here :)
Sorry if these are simple. I use vi and [e]grep all the time, with awk
and sed fairly often, but I rarely use Perl (gasp!) or anything else
with nested captured substrings so I'm clueless here.
nvi+Perl 4life. Read up on perl's -n switch and you will never need awk/sed again.
Thanks for helping,
Thanks a lot,
PS that should be e?grep :)
True, true.. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://SecLists.Org