|
Nmap Development
mailing list archives
Re: nmap issue
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:38:28 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:36:20 -0400
"Mike pattrick" <mpattrick () rhinovirus org> wrote:
Oops, I sent the previous copy of this to Fyodor only instead of the
nmap-dev list.
I guess this is a completely loaded suggestion as implementation would
be difficult, but you could bypass UAC if nmap's scanner was
implemented as a service.
Sincerely,
Michael Patrick
Correct me if I'm wrong (Gianluca?), but you don't need to make Nmap a
service as long as WinPCAP is installed and running as a service.
Brandon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkguDO0ACgkQqaGPzAsl94JReQCgrF4cb/FLBkV9AyV0S+azNm3J
PIsAn2gdJdeGLAxdElLd/YcGO6V7H2VJ
=c95T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: nmap issue, (continued)
|