mailing list archives
Re: ambiguity about nmap results
From: "DePriest, Jason R." <jrdepriest () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:17:54 +0100
Debian is worse, much worse. Both the test and unstable branches have
4.53-3 as the latest.
Stable is listed as 4.11-1! According to the nmap changelog, that was
"stable" on 2006/06/23, coming close to two years ago. Nmap is so
much better than it was back then!
Ugh. I just roll my own.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Brandon Enright <> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:22:46 +0300
"sara fink" <sara.fink () gmail com> wrote:
on my laptop I have nmap version 4.60 from gentoo portage.
4.62 appears as non stable in portage.
The Gentoo arch/~arch model (as well as most other distributions notion
of stable/unstable) typically doesn't match the Nmap development cycle.
For Nmap it is generally the case that x.z is /more/ stable and better
tested than x.y when z > y.
At least for nmap, you probably should add
# Networking (or ~x86, etc)
I love Gentoo but don't expect the devs and package maintainers to make
the best decisions for your particular usage case.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://SecLists.Org