Nmap Development: Re: Fix for HTTP_open_proxy.nse

[Vlatko Kosturjak <kost () linux hr>]

Hello Sven!

Thanks for your comments!

Sven Klemm wrote:
> I think it's not necessary to do regular expression-matching here as
> the service field can only have values from either nmap-services or
> nmap-service-probes. A better fix for the portrule is probably
> portrule =
> shortport.port_or_service({3128,8000,8080},{'squid-http','http-proxy'})
If you take a look at original source, it checked for following:

if      (port.number == 3128 or port.number == 8080 or port.service ==
"http-proxy" or port.service == "squid-proxy" or port.service ==
"squid-proxy?")

So, it checked for "squid-proxy" and "squid-proxy?". Your sugestion
wouldn't detect that (it's probably older version of squid detection
display). Not sure if we need that, but just want to make sure we don't
miss anything.

Also, does portrule you suggested detect "squid-http?" and "http-proxy?"?

Let me know your thoughts, so I can write new patch according to our
discussion.

Thanks in advance!

Kost

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org