mailing list archives
Re: [PATCH] [Ncat] Fix EOF handling
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:24:56 -0600
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:11:14AM -0600, David Fifield wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:20:41PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
David Fifield wrote:
That's a good idea. In svn://svn.insecure.org/nmap-exp/david/nmap-listen
I added -k/--keep-open like you suggested. -k doesn't conflict with any
nc or GNU Netcat options. However, I see that a Windows version of
Netcat uses -L ("listen harder") for much the same feature.
There was a request for -L in Ncat, and Kris pointed out that -l already
But because persistent connections cause some programs to lose the tail
end of transfers, we're thinking of making non-persistent the default. I
think the ncat-listen branch does what we need, but it remains to choose
the user interface. I like -k/--keep-open, but -L (and maybe --Listen?)
has the benefit of a precedent. Does anyone have a preference?
I'm confused: Daniel said in his initial post that the -k option in his patch
is like the same option from BSD netcat. So -k has precedent too, right?
Silly me, I forgot that there was a patch at the beginning of this long
thread. I ended up doing almost exactly the same thing in the
ncat-listen branch. It's because I didn't understand the problem at
I'm glad BSD nc has -k, because I like that better also. Ours works a
little differently; nc -k handles one connection at a time and other
connections block until the first is ended.
I move that we adopt Daniel's listen-mode patch, because ncat-listen
also had a refactoring of --exec that I don't think is worth it.
I ended up selectively merging a couple of revisions from ncat-listen
because I had also made some test and documentation changes. This is
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://SecLists.Org