mailing list archives
Re: error semantics of faulty dependencies
From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:03:14 -0500
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:20 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
I can summarize it thus:
Strong dependencies: dependencies must exist and be run.
Ron: dependencies must exist, whether or not they are run.
Current situation: dependencies need not exist nor be run.
So do we want to change to the "Ron dependencies" (I'm fine with the
name btw ;)?
- Patrick Donnelly
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/