Home page logo

nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: http-methods.nse implementation
From: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost () linux hr>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:57:57 +0100

On 03/08/2011 02:49 PM, Rob Nicholls wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:33:48 +0200, Josh Amishav-Zlatin wrote:
Would it make more sense for the
script to have a base list of methods that it checks for regardless of
whether OPTIONS is enabled or not and then appends that list based on
the results of an OPTIONS request?

I'd prefer not to trust OPTIONS at all, and perhaps rename the existing
option or add something like http-methods.force or http-methods.thorough
to test a long hardcoded base list of methods like you suggest. The
current "retest" option doesn't really retest the methods, it simply
performs a more thorough test based on the original OPTIONS response
(which, as you point out, could be inaccurate).

I think we discussed this already some time ago:
...and I remember, decision was to have it like this.

And in case you're interested into script which does all tricks
mentioned, you can find Perl script on github:

Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]