Home page logo
/

nmap-dev logo Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:16:36 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:26:13 +0300 Shinnok <admin () shinnok com> wrote:
Uhaa..that's a great chance for this GSoC for a project to turn Nmap
into a killing beast that can scan for open *processes* on a machine,
detect and identify processes and then have the ability to kill the
rogue ones. Hurr up, there's only so little time till the GSoC
application deadline. Hell, I think I will propose that too. :-)
smb-enum-processes can do half of it and smb-psexec can do the rest. 

Just sayin' :)

Ron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2cvBcACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/TahACg2bPSKpt0Ws0zEmbgI6Pea3j/
EpsAnRaDfjIUNcLkFgbn93HNgXQJFM/U
=8li0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]