On 2011-05-16 19:17:41 -0700, Fyodor wrote:
If you don't have more vulns in mind for this script, maybe it would
be best to name it after the Postfix Cyrus SASL vulnerability it
detects. Then if we find a later SMTP vulnerability and we believe it
makes sense to combine detection into one script, we could do so then?
Or if we decide they would be best structured as different scripts
(from a user interface perspective), we could move the shared code to
There are the exim vulnerabilities (one of them is too old).
If we decide to change the name, what do you think about: