mailing list archives
Re: Java RMI service finderprint?
From: Gabriel Lawrence <gabriel.lawrence () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:32:30 -0700
I suppose i should go read the source... But, I'll ask here.
--version-all (Try every single probe) .
An alias for --version-intensity 9, ensuring that every single
probe is attempted against
So, does it stop as soon as one match is found or does it continue? what
order does it pick? i think the solution i was suggesting was that it only
go and try all the ones it wouldnt have normally tried when all the normal
ones fail... If thats the way -version-all works, that's cool and would
totally meet my needs.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:14 AM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>wrote:
Maybe this is an opportunity to add a flag to ignore ports and try
all service fingerprints against a listener that didn't fingerprint in
the original pass?
That's what --version-all does.
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Re: Java RMI service finderprint? Patrik Karlsson (Jun 14)
- Re: Java RMI service finderprint?, (continued)