mailing list archives
Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments
From: Aleksandar Nikolic <nikolic.alek () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:50:31 +0200
Sorry for the late reply.
Apparently my ISP thought I won't be needing
Internet connection this weekend...
done with the brute.firstonly parameter.
Also, what do you mean by "quite some time"? If you detect this
behavior (pcAnywhere implementation) and if this value is always the
same between versions, then your code could just sleep() for this
duration? Or is there a need for an active sleep(<short time>) and
In my tests, it the time needed to wait wasn't constant. So this
wait-and-retry cycle seemed like a best option.
I'll do some cosmetic fixes and, if there are no objections, will
commit the script later today.
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/