mailing list archives
Re: [FEATURE] Multible scan options in the same run
From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:14:12 +0100
10/12/2013 11:03:57 Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>:
On 12/10/2013 08:02 AM, John Bond wrote:
* How will NSE portrules work when the port is in multiple states?
I'd probably stick with SYN for the portrules. My intention was to point out
that this way one could easily spot the interesting differences between scan
results, but these don't necessarily have to lead to discovering new open
ports. SYN scan/-sT is AFAIK most reliable there.
* How can this be made better than a shell script that runs each type in
You could do quite a lot in shell scripts, but configuring output and
parallelism would be pretty hard there. That's why I'd say that it belongs to
the scanner instead.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Sent through the dev mailing list
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/