> I don't have a working Windows box at the moment, but when I do I will
> certainly check it out and probably merge the port into the mainstream
> tree so it doesn't fall behind. Also, it is critical that I run some
> benchmarks. If the NT version is as fast or faster than UNIX, I have some
> very important optimizing to do :).
It doesn't appear to be an issue...
D:\Nmapnt>nmapnt -sT -v -O 216.xxx.xxx.xxx
Starting nmapNT V. 2.53 by ryan_at_eEye.com
eEye Digital Security ( http://www.eEye.com )
based on nmap by fyodor_at_insecure.org ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
.
.
.
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1520 seconds
user_at_server:/> nmap -sT -v -O 216.xxx.xxx.xxx
Starting nmap V. 2.12 by Fyodor (fyodor_at_dhp.com, www.insecure.org/nmap/)
.
.
.
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3 seconds
Andy Wilson
--------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-hackers) mailing list, send a blank email to
nmap-hackers-help_at_insecure.org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Received on Jul 18 2000
Intro
