mailing list archives
R: Re: [oss-security] vsftpd download backdoored
From: "pinto.elia () gmail com" <pinto.elia () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:22:45 +0000
Sorry for not quoting. Just for Info rpm5 have all the necessary for embedding all these check in a spec file from
years. Regards. Elia
Da: Moritz Muehlenhoff
Inviato: 04/07/2011, 18:56
A: oss-security () lists openwall com
Oggetto: Re: [oss-security] vsftpd download backdoored
Solar Designer wrote:
Here's a great example of why maintainers should sign their release
tarballs, why distributions should insist on that, and why they should
actually check the signatures indeed.
I think we should be referring to this when convincing people to do that
(I had moderate success so far - some projects started signing their
tarballs after my suggestions/requests, some did not).
New vsftpd homepage:
IIRC for such backdoored downloads CVE IDs were assigned in the past
to properly track the status of distributions providing the affected
piece of code.
Can someone please assign an ID for this?
- R: Re: [oss-security] vsftpd download backdoored pinto.elia () gmail com (Jul 05)