mailing list archives
Re: CVE Request: Security issue in backuppc
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifrie () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:21:08 -0700
On 01/03/2012 12:55 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:00:48PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
While preparing updates to fix CVE-2011-3361 in Ubuntu I discovered
another XSS vulnerability in View.pm when accessing the following URLs
index.cgi?action=view&type=XferLOG&num=<XSS here>&host=<some host>
index.cgi?action=view&type=XferErr&num=<XSS here>&host=<some host>
You are being emailed as the upstream contact. Please keep
oss-security () lists openwall com CC'd for any updates on this issue.
To oss-security, can I have a CVE for this? It is essentially the same
vulnerability and fix as for CVE-2011-3361, but in CGI/View.pm instead
of CGI/Browse.pm. Attached is a patch to fix this issue. Tested on
3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0 and 3.2.1.
This hasn't ended up in a CVE assignment.
I believe as per ADT4 these issues should be merged into the existing
At this stage, X and Y are the same bug type, affect the same versions,
and affect the same products.
Do X and Y have any of the following characteristics?
X appears in a different DLL, library, or program than Y (e.g. X
affects LIB1.DLL and Y affects LIB2.DLL)
X has more serious impact than Y (e.g. code execution as root versus
leak of system pathname)
X takes a different input parameter/argument than Y (e.g. SQL
injection in both the "user" and "password" parameters)
X is exploitable locally, but Y is not.
X requires stronger authentication than Y.
X can be exploited by a certain user that Y can not (e.g. a guest
user vs. an admin)
Yes: MERGE them. These characteristics are irrelevant for CVE.
-- Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team