mailing list archives
Re: distros & linux-distros embargo period and message format
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 05:45:39 +0400
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:26:26PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I think the important aspect here is the transparency of the private
discussion (after an appropriate delay), rather than the length of the
Thank you for sharing your opinion.
Yet the delay itself matters too. There are different opinions as to
whether it is "the important aspect" or not.
That can be set by the researcher (with some reasonable
maximum, like a month).
We all should be able to see what is going on over in the closed list.
Although it is unlikely being used for nefarious purposes (hiding
issues permanently, etc.), transparency (after a delay) is the only
way to show that it is not. Anyway, 30 days seems appropriate.
I don't mind. Like I said, I need a tool - a program to mass-decrypt a
PGP/MIME mbox, producing another mbox. I think such a program might be
generally useful. Well, or alternatively I need to introduce a
different mechanism for the archive - not treat it as a regular
subscriber like I intended to.
Re: distros & linux-distros embargo period and message format Thomas Klausner (Feb 01)