mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: surf
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:09:50 -0700
On 02/10/2012 03:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kurt Seifried:
On 02/09/2012 05:24 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
surf does not protect its cookie jar against access read access from
other local users, as reported by Jakub Wilk in this Debian bug:
Could someone please assign a CVE for this?
So for surf suckless (http://surf.suckless.org/) please use CVE-2012-0842
Oops. I mistook this for the HTTP client library. Your reference is
correct, and it appears I consistently wrote "surf" (the correct
uzbl <http://uzbl.org/> (in the uzbl-browser wrapper script) and
netsurf <http://www.netsurf-browser.org/> (the nsgtk_check_homedir
function creates the dot directory with world-readable settings) have
a similar issue, but are from different code bases. I think those
should get distinct CVEs, too.
I'll need advisories or code commits, or links to the vuln code to
assign CVE's (I need more information). Thanks!
Jakub has filed bugs:
Not ideal (I'd prefer upstream stuff) but it'll do.
Please use CVE-2012-0843 for this issue.
Please use CVE-2012-0844 for this issue.
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)