mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE for Virtualbox 0x8 DoS?
From: halfdog <me () halfdog net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:04:04 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Frank Mehnert wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2012 12:12:44 halfdog wrote:
Kurt Seifried wrote:
On 09/13/2012 10:59 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Has a CVE id been finally assigned for the following issue?
- From that page:
20120910: Oracle security decides, that CVE should be assigned
Can Oracle/halfdog.net communicate the CVE to the community
I do not have that information yet. The information about intended CVE
assignment till October update was exchanged off list, contact on
Oracle side was Mr. Mehnert.
Early disclosure of this issue was due to misconception, that Oracle
would have assessed severity, need for CVE and communication of
disclosure timeline before releasing patch as maintenance release. The
early disclosure mixed up the whole
reporting/analyze/classify/CVE-assign/disclosure process somehow.
The security folks told me that there will be a CVE which will be
visible with the next scheduled Oracle CPU date (in October 2012).
Seems that Oracle CPU day was 2012-10-16, CVE is CVE-2012-3221
I've collected references to this issue from HTTP referers and added
them at the bottom of
PGP: 156A AE98 B91F 0114 FE88 2BD8 C459 9386 feed a bee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Re: CVE for Virtualbox 0x8 DoS? halfdog (Oct 18)