mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: TLS CBC padding timing flaw in various SSL / TLS implementations
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:55:39 -0700
* [2013-02-05 16:54:54 +0100] Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Matthias Weckbecker wrote:
has there already been a CVE assigned for the recent "lucky 13" timing
flaw that affects various SSL / TLS implementations (including GnuTLS)?
I think this could qualify for CVE for each open source implementation
openssl has released updated packages with a CVE assigned, unclear
whether it covers just openssl or also the others.
cc'ing cve-assign to see if they can provide some guidance here. I also
noticed that OpenSSL has a CVE for this (I'm assuming that the
CVE-2012-2686 issue is _not_ the same thing, but that CVE-2013-0169 is
Since it's a weakness in TLS/DTLS itself, from my understanding, and not
necessarily in a particular implementation, I'm not sure if this
qualifies as one CVE for the weakness, or if it needs one per
MITRE, can someone provide some guidance on this?
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Re: CVE request: TLS CBC padding timing flaw in various SSL / TLS implementations Shawn (Feb 05)