Home page logo

oss-sec logo oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Ruby CVEs
From: Henri Salo <henri () nerv fi>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:21:47 +0200

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:05:13PM +0000, Christey, Steven M. wrote:
I agree with Alexander.  The CVE assignment process is never intended to introduce unnecessary delays to the 
publication of vulnerability information.  Merely noting whether CVEs have already been requested should reduce most 
of the risk of duplicates without forcing people to delay publication.

- Steve

There hasn't been any delays in publication of this security vulnerability.
Advisory was made in different mailing list without CVE. This is the reason I
asked him to request CVE identifier and pointed to oss-security mailing list.

CVE got assigned. List knows about the issue. End of story. Next problem,

Henri Salo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]