Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetration X Auditing Teste & other misteries
From: "Christopher M. Bergeron" <ChrisB () HGSS COM>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:03:02 -0400

I can still guarantee that 'agreed' test will be much more productive than
the 'stealth' one.

Vanja Hrustic

Is it possible that if the Net admins 'know' you'll be trying to get, they may try even harder to make it difficult for 
you?  I.e. they go out of their way to apply the last 42 patches that they've been neglecting before you can find 
something... and thus produce an "inaccurate" portrait of the network.  Had the admins not been aware of the test, the 
network would have been left in a "truer" state.  A state more like what a potential black-hat would find in a real 
world scenario.  Or do you consider this a "special case" and not typical?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Re: [PEN-TEST] Penetration X Auditing Teste & other misteries Christopher M. Bergeron (Aug 26)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]