mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] WebEx security?
From: Ken Pfeil <kpfeil () MIRADIANT COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:38:23 -0500
I'm pretty sure that the last thing they want is a bunch of port scanning
being done on the basis of your assumption. What is your criteria for a
"general overview" and the basis for your conclusion?
Director, Information Security
Miradiant Global Network, Inc
kpfeil () nospam miradiant com
15 Broad Street
New York, NY 10005
"Of course my password is the same as my pet's name.
My dog's name was Q47pY!3$H9x, but I change it every 90 days."
From: Erik Tayler [mailto:erik () DIGITALOFFENSE NET]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:36 AM
To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: Re: [PEN-TEST] WebEx security?
A general overview would suffice. Anyone with non-intrusive probing
capabilities would be able to tell right off the bat.
And no, I didn't break into their site, then draw up the conclusion they
Alfred Huger wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Erik Tayler wrote:
Judging by the state of security of their network, I wouldn't go with
them. Security is the last thing they should be talking about on their
site. Just my 2 cents.
How exactly did you come to this conclusion?
Re: [PEN-TEST] WebEx security? T. Barrick (Nov 01)