Home page logo

pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: [PEN-TEST] Cissp
From: "Less, Linda" <Linda.Less () PHARMA COM>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:09:01 -0400

I would love to get a copy too! I too worked at E&Y in New York City, but
they didn't have that information when I was there. Are the copies
electronic or hard? If electronic you can just email them to me at
linda.less () pharma com

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Rothke [SMTP:brothke () EBNETWORKS COM]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:38 PM
Subject:      Re: [PEN-TEST] Cissp


When I was at Ernst & Young, we developed an internal CISSP preparation

They decided not to offer the class again but I still have the tens sets
PowerPoint slides from the CBK Review.

Let me know if you want a copy.


Ben Rothke, CISSP <brothke () ebnetworks com>
Network Security Consultant
eB Networks, Inc. - Leading the way to eBusiness - at NetSpeed!

-----Original Message-----
From: Penetration Testers [mailto:PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On Behalf
Of Sassaman, Kim
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 7:20 PM
Subject: [PEN-TEST] Cissp
Importance: High

This is off topic but what resources did you use to study for the CISSP
certification.  Im looking into taking the exam and was wondering if
were some better refrences than the study guide availiable??

Kim Sassaman
Charles Schwab, Inc.
Technology Innovation
Information Security Services
Senior Staff - Access Engineering
2343 East Lincoln Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Member: SIPC/New York Stock Exchange
[Work] 602-355-3330
[Mobile] 602-421-4916
[MobileMail] 6024214916 () mobile att net
<mailto:6024214916 () mobile att net>
[Pager] 877-568-4936
[PageMail] 8775684936 () skytel com <mailto:8775684936 () skytel com>
WARNING: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received
orotherwise recorded by the Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and
issubject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure
to,someone other than the recipient.

-----Original Message-----
From: Meritt, Jim [mailto:Jim.Meritt () WANG COM]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-TEST] Testing a "rogue site"

Concur.  To have a system to secure, you need the system.

Has anyone noticed that the original question was totally non-technical?

There seems to be a belief that all that is involved is
technical.  There is
more to it than that.  How do you write up what you find?  How do
you "sell"
it (to management). The business aspects appear to be totally

The "dot coms" thought that way.  Notice the business failures?

The opinions expressed above are my own.  The facts simply are
and belong to
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Senior Information Systems Security and Audit Analyst,
Information Assurance
Center of Excellence
Wang Government Services, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Karyn Pichnarczyk [mailto:karyn () SANDSTORM NET]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: Testing a "rogue site"


I totally disagree with the two rules stated above.  yes, You need your
company's written approval of your responsibilities.  But unless you go
the One and Only rule, you will not last long in the security trade:

1. Business Must Continue.

If this rule is not followed, then it doesn't matter how good or bad
the security posture is: the company just won't exist!


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]