Home page logo
/

pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: [PEN-TEST] Legalities and Liabilities
From: Coderian <coderian () CHECKSUM ORG>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:19:06 +0200

Hallo terug,

Well this is a legal aspect which nowadays can be put in court (if it will
come that far) in different ways. So not to bother anyone with "Cyber" Law I
redirect you to the book of Ryan Russell "Hack proofing you Network internet
tradecraft" in the first chapter he explains the politics. But it as i said
before it depends on the country you live in and it's law.

Greets,

Coderian

Research & Development
checksum.org



Hallo,

    I have some questions regarding the legal aspects of penetration
testing (I'm  hoping this hasn't be answered on the list before,
I haven't had time to keep up for the past couple of weeks).

1.) Before a pen/sec test takes place, what type of legal documentation
should be obtained (disclaimers, limitation of liability, etc..)?
2.) What are major topics that should be discussed and included in a
contract between the pen/sec company and their client?  Should a
contract even be written up in the first place?
3.) When conducting a pen/sec test what legal issues should be kept in
mind (e.g.. get out of jail free type of stuff).
5.) After a pen/sec test, if the client's network is cracked, can the
pen/sec company be held responsible?
6.) If the pen/sec company offers services such as actual securing of
systems, can they be held responsible if the systems they secured are
cracked?

I'd appreciate as much feed back as possible.  Once again I apologize if
this has already been discussed.

Thanks,
Ben Lull

***
* Ben Lull
* ValleyLocal Internet, Inc.
* Systems Administrator
***



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]