|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
RE: Port identification methodology
From: Yonatan Bokovza <Yonatan () xpert com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:59:38 +0300
Hi,
a common way of handling many cleartext protocols is
sending "QUIT\n" and grabbing the output.
To solve your question i'd say we need a DB of every
protocol in existance and what does it "likes" to recive
in a packet or two- in order to reply with its name/version.
Same goes for UDP, BTW.
Best Regards,
Yonatan Bokovza
IT Security Consultant
Xpert Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Norman [mailto:erik.norman () ccnox com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 13:14
To: pen test
Subject: Port identification methodology
Hi all,
I have a question regarding methodology while performing a
PT. It concerns identifying programs/services.
Imagine a full nmap scan has been performed. A handfull
of open ports was found on a particular server. The
usual 25, 53, 80 etc are identified, but one or two ports
stand out from the crowd. Looking in various 'common ports'
files does not provide a hint what the port is used for.
Connecting with telnet yields no text, and a tcpdump
dump does not provide any text (in clear anyway).
Now what!???
How should one approach this?
/Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service
For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to
the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|