Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: Is ipchains -y secure enough?
From: "Golden_Eternity" <bhodi () bigfoot com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 00:23:49 -0700

Be sure that the system is set to assemble fragmented packets. I don't know
if ipchains in particular is vulnerable to that problem, but I have heard of
other cases where it was possible to fragment a packet so that the TCP flags
weren't interpreted by the firewall and allowed to pass through.

Also, before you use '! -y', be sure you understand what it does. Since -y
triggers on packets that contain a syn and not ack or fin, the opposite of
that is a packet that contains fin and ack but not syn.

iptables provides much more control over the flags that trigger a rule, but
its still fairly new so that may or may not be an option for you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Stoev [mailto:philip () stoev org]
Subject: Is ipchains -y secure enough?

Excuse me for the ignorance, but I would like to ask if the community
considers ipchains rules containing the -y flag as secure for
the purpose of
TCP filtering. Such a rule will prevent the stablishment of
TCP connections
to the host being firewalled. Is there a way to curcumvent such a
protection?




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]