|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: RE: RE: PIX and ttl
From: Eugene Tsyrklevich <eugene () securityarchitects com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:11:25 -0700
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 08:28:59PM +0100, Fernando Cardoso wrote:
[...]
The work around is break in and NMAP from the internal network ;)
Another option is to do some research on the possibility of
doing fingerprinting on the other TCP states (ESTABILISHED, FIN_WAIT,
...).
A method I use to discover windows machines behind a statefull
aware firewall with syndefender is to create ESTABILISHED connections
and analyze the ip.id increments. This analysis can be expanded to
otherfields of the packets and other states by doing some research.
That's my approach too. DF field and window sizes (if stuff like
Packeteer are not used) can be also used. If pinging is enabled Ofir
Arkin's papers would be valuable too.
Perhaps a fingerprinting system that uses traces from a
tcpdumpsession? anyone?
That would be a nice tool. I wonder if siphon already does part of the
job? I don't the code right now to check...
siphon uses libpcap and has an option for feeding in your tcpdump -w sessions
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: PIX and ttl, (continued)
|