Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: Application security eval - methodology
From: Gamble <a629w () unb ca>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 15:54:20 -0300 (ADT)

Has anyone published a framework for evaluating the
security impact of an application (that is, a "black
box", a binary provided by a vendor)?


While I am not aware of a paper which talks about evaluating the security
impact of a binary,  there are a few good papers out there which talk
about reverse engineering Windows binaries looking for common security
holes (ie: buffer overflows and format string attacks).  

Check out:

HalVar Flake's presentation at the Blackhat conference called "Finding
holes in closed-source software" at
http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-europe-00/bh-europe-00-speakers.html

and also Dark Spyrit's paper in Phrack 55 called "Win32 Buffer Overflows
(Location, Exploitation and prevention".  you can find it at
http://www.blinky-lights.org/phrack/phrack55/P55-15


Cheers,

-- Jamie


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]