|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: Wireless Pent-Test
From: Cedric Blancher <blancher () cartel-securite fr>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:10:36 +0200
Le mar 07/10/2003 à 11:00, Raistlin a écrit :
WEP (RC4, in fact) can be cracked, AND it also suffers from weak
initialization vectors.
This could be understood as "RC4 could be cracked", implying RC4 is
weak, which is not true when used properly. WEP can be cracked because
because it make a quite poor use of RC4.
--
http://www.netexit.com/~sid/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tired of constantly searching the web for the latest exploits?
Tired of using 300 different tools to do one job?
Get CORE IMPACT and get some rest.
www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
RE: Wireless Pent-Test Maxime Rousseau (Oct 06)
Re: Wireless Pent-Test Michael J. Semaniuk (Oct 06)
RE: Wireless Pent-Test Steve De Doncker (Oct 06)
(Thread continues...)
|