|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: By passing surf control
From: c3rb3r <c3rb3r () sympatico ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 05:33:13 -0800
Hello
Not sure about which version we are talking about but here are my
findings on a 4.5.0.31 (several months of that ),
mounted as a sniffer 'like' (stealth mode, whatever ..) BUT _not a proxy_.
Using telnet (in char mode) to connect a remote web server and doing so,
by splitting your request into several small packets, you get your site.
Sc's monitor will correctly show up the host header while its sniffer
counterpart keeps to be blind, strange ? even more, when monitor reports
that the forbidden site was actually granted :)
It was even possible to fool Sc by crafting by hand a host header field
with a permitted address while connecting a forbidden site, everything
seems to rely on that masterpiece. I can't remember of http/0.9 | 1.0
(so without host:) but it may works as well, try it.
In the later scenario, many sites using virtual domains will obviously
become unreachable though.
A last one i found around 2 years ago (don't know if it still works,
which release it was, but is worth to check imo), in this mode
(sniffer) Sc was actually replying before (spoofing) the web server with
a rst packet to my source port, the real answer was still returned to my
host but anyway, too late
So i decided to write a small piece of perl to proxy my browser, ignore
the first reset packet, and finally pass back the real data to my browser.
it worked like a charm.
I have never tried Sc as a real proxy, chances are it is "better" in
this configuration but nothing for sure :)
Hope this helps.
Gregory
Charles Hamby wrote:
Have you tried checking to see if IP address obfuscation works?
In case anyone's not familair with this...
Using http://www.amazon.com as an example. If I wanted to go there
but it was blocked, I would find out what the IP address of
www.amazon.com is (say using ping).
In this case it happens to be 207.171.181.16. I would then convert
each octet into hex individually. (207 is CF, 171 is AB, 181 is B5
and 16 is 10)
Then I would put CFABB510 into my calculator (Windows calculator works
just fine for this, by the way) and conver it to decimal again. I
would come up with 3484136720
I would open up my web browser and put in http://3484136720 and up
comes Amazon.com.
Charles Hamby
McNutt, Jacob wrote:
SSH tunneling/port forwarding to a proxy might work if they have
access to it. Also, we have a problem with AOL client browsers that
can bypass Websense all together.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kudakwashe Chafa-Govha [mailto:KChafa-Govha () bankunitedfla com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 3:04 PM
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: By passing surf control
Hello Group,
Does anyone have any information on how to by pass a web content
filter? We use Surf Control to monitor and filter web content.
However, I have one of my users who was able to by pass this. We
tried using a proxy to by pass just for testing purposes but it did
not work. I am still trying to figure out what other method he used
to do so. If anyone has any information , it will be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks
Kuda
**************************************************************************************************
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
It is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system
manager or the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended
recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and
must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any
part of it.
**************************************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: By passing surf control, (continued)
|