mailing list archives
RE: Application Assessment
From: "Brokken, Allen P." <BrokkenA () missouri edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:20:02 -0500
I did not get an eval of AppScan and run them head to head. I took the published features of both from their websites
and compared them on paper. The key issues I noted were WebInspect identified some vulnerability types that AppScan
didn't and there were some reporting differences. Based on what each company published about themselves at the time
WebInspect was offering a greater feature set, and it had already proven itsself to be an excellent product.
From: Juan Carlos Reyes Muñoz [mailto:jcreyes () etb net co]
Sent: Fri 8/12/2005 10:26 AM
To: Brokken, Allen P.
Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com; 'Webappsec'
Subject: RE: Application Assessment
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One question... have you ever tried Watchfire's Appscan? If so, which tool
could be better between Appscan and Webinspect?
Juan Carlos Reyes Muñoz
GIAC Certified Forensic Analyst - SANS Institute
Consultor de Seguridad Informática
Cel. (57) 311 513 9280
1900 N.W. 97th Avenue
Suite No. 722-1971
Miami, FL 33172
Las opiniones expresadas en esta comunicación son enteramente personales. De
igual manera, esta comunicación y todos sus datos adjuntos son
confidenciales y exclusivamente para el destinatario. Si por algún motivo
recibe esta comunicación y usted NO es el destinatario, hágamelo saber
respondiendo a este correo y por favor destruya cualquier copia del mismo y
de los datos adjuntos. Por favor tambien trate de olvidar cualquier cosa que
haya leido en esta comunicación, excepto en esta parte. Está prohibido
cualquier uso inadecuado de esta información, así como la generación de
copias de este mensaje. Gracias.
The contents and thoughts included in this e-mail are completely personal.
This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
this message and attachments. Please also try to forget everything you have
read that was contained in this E-Mail message, except this part. Misuse,
copying and redistribution of this e-mail are forbidden. Thank you.
De: Brokken, Allen P. [mailto:BrokkenA () missouri edu]
Enviado el: Jueves, 11 de Agosto de 2005 01:43 p.m.
Para: Glyn Geoghegan; goenw
CC: pen-test () securityfocus com; Webappsec
Asunto: RE: Application Assessment
I am a Security Analyst for the University of Missouri - Columbia Campus.
I came from a systems administration background, and in the past 18 months
have been tasked with application security as just part of a greater
Information Systems Auditing program.
I personally have used
SpikeProxy from www.insecure.org
Paros, mentioned by others
and evaluated a handful of other Proxy/Automated Attack Methods.
However, the best tool I've seen and the one we finally purchased is
WebInspect from SPI Dynamics
I did some independent test between SpikeProxy and WebInspect on the a few
different applications. With SpikeProxy it took basically 1 working day
to run the tool, and verify false positives, look up good references for
the vulnerabilities and write the report. The same application with
WebInspect took approximately 15 minutes of my time to configure, and
generate the final report while taking about 2 hours to actually run
without my intervention. It typically found 20% more vulnerabilities than
I could find by the more manual method with SpikeProxy, and produced
extensive reports that not only explained the vulnerabilities, but gave
code references the developers could use to fix their problem.
Those were results I got prior to training. I got some extensive training
with the tool and on web application testing in general at Security-PS
http://www.securityps.com. They are a Professional Application Security
auditing company and they use this as their core tool because of both the
accuracy of the tool and the responsiveness of the company. In the
training I got to learn how to effectively use the a whole suite of tools
including a Web Brute force attacker, SQL Injector, Proxy, Encoders /
Decoders, and Web Service assessment tools to name a few.
The tool is a little pricey, but I work with litterally dozens of campus
departments and have evaluated LAMP, JAVA/ORACLE, ASP.NET/SQL Server and
even VBScript/Access systems with the WebInspect Suite of tools. The #1
comment I get from the developers is how helpful the report was in
correcting their code. For that broad spectrum of coding enviroments I
couldn't possibly provide code level help to the developers without this
We've been using it now for almost a year and the responsiveness of their
Sales and Technial staff has been extreme. I haven't had a single issue
that wasn't resolved in less than 24 hours. I've also gotten a lot of
support from their sales staff regarding application security awareness
for our campus developers in general.
One last thing to mention is the updates. I have never seen a tool that
is so consistently updated. I have run 2 or 3 assessments in the same day
and had updates for new vulnerabilities made available each time I ran the
tool. If a week goes by without using it there can be litterally 100's of
new signatures it needs to add to the list.
If you have more questions and want to talk offline I'd be happy to answer
Systems Security Analyst - Principal
Univeristy of Missouri
brokkena () missouri edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.1 (Build 2185)
Comment: Mensaje Seguro, Enviado por Juan Carlos Reyes M.
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
FREE WHITE PAPER - Wireless LAN Security: What Hackers Know That You Don't
Learn the hacker's secrets that compromise wireless LANs. Secure your
WLAN by understanding these threats, available hacking tools and proven
countermeasures. Defend your WLAN against man-in-the-Middle attacks and
session hijacking, denial-of-service, rogue access points, identity
thefts and MAC spoofing. Request your complimentary white paper at:
- Re: Application Assessment, (continued)