Something to think of,
Yes, most shells have keylogging built in, but most pen-test reports
require you to not only provide keylogging, but also timestamps
(depending on where you are working, sometimes in UTC format), or they
are not accepted as real logs.
Aaron J. Bedra
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:41 +0200, Guillaume Vissian wrote:
> Be carefull the history logs only show the common commands input on
> the shell, this didn't show everything wrappen on it. Only keyloggers
> can do that. If history remember all it would be a major security
> failure... For example with shells history logs you can't see the vim
> editing sequences, and for sure the password entries. And the real,
> and only for me, utility of a keylogger is to log thoses pass entries.
> A good keylogger have to, in my mind, be directly implanted in the
> kernel, the shells let to much ways to escape from the logs...
> A way to search :
> http://linux.ittoolbox.com/documents/document.asp?i=2284
>
> Google is your friend
> G.
>
> 2005/7/1, Joshua Hamor <josh_at_cnemedia.com>:
> > Agreed. Most modern shells have history logs. You should be able to save
> > this text file for your tests.
> >
> > -J also
> >
> > Jeff Miller wrote:
> > > I've used bash shell logging before for similar situations. just grab
> > > the source and compile with the syslogging option.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 30, 2005, at 2:36 PM, JB wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'm wondering if anyone has either a kernel level keystroke logger
> > >> for the
> > >> Linux 2.6, or a userspace keystroke logger for Linux. As part of our
> > >> penetration testing, we are required to give the client a log of all
> > >> actions performed - so this would be a good way of logging all linux
> > >> commands. Also - if you know of the same sort of tool for windows - that
> > >> would also be appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> -J
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
Received on Jul 01 2005
Intro
