Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Penetration Testing: Re: DDos within a pentest

Re: DDos within a pentest

From: Thierry Zoller <Thierry_at_sniff-em.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 21:12:38 +0200

Dear Julian Totzek,

Considering this :
JT> I don’t want to get a bandwidth overload, I just want
JT> to show that the server is not able to handle all the syn packets.

I don't understand this :
JT> We only have a 2Mbit line here in the office, so if I need to
JT> flood a 10Mbit line there will not be enough packets to do this,
JT> right?

If you send SYN packets to an open port with active services you won't
need a 2mbit line to DoS a 10mbit line, except of course your into
traffic exhaustion which your first statement however negates.

JT> The third question is what will be the side effects if I send
JT> packets with spoofed sources?
If the spoofed sources exist they will be flooded with SYN+ACKS or FIN
packets from the host you attack. You might one to choose to spoof an
IP which isn't alive.

JT> As you all know I don't a answer to
JT> my packets, but would it be a DDos to all spoofed sources then?
Depends on how often you change the decoys (spoofed ingress addresses)

JT> How can you ensure that only the main target is getting flooded?
Testen testen testen.

-- 
Thierry Zoller
mailto:Thierry_at_sniff-em.com
Received on May 09 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos