Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: Insecure Hash Algorithms (MD5) and NTLMv2
From: Daniel Miessler <daniel () dmiessler com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:44:39 -0500


On Nov 2, 2005, at 1:54 AM, Steve Friedl wrote:

The only weakness that's really in the air is Collision Resistance,
where we can produce two inputs with the same hash. This is of only
minor concern in a practical sense, though it certainly does mean that
blood is in the water and sharks are circling.

Exactly my point. To put it another way, the ability to create collisions has no bearing on the ability of an attacker to find unknown inputs to known hashes. Or, in the technical terms that you highlighted, attacks against collision resistance don't necessarily lead to attacks on preimage resistance.

Hence, for the purposes of breaking hashes to discover passwords, NTLMv2 is not significantly affected by the recently discovered weaknesses in the MD5 hashing algorithm.

--
Daniel R. Miessler
M: daniel () dmiessler com
W: http://dmiessler.com
G: 0x316BC712




Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]