|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: Re: Core Impact vs. Canvas vs. Metasploit
From: alphafreq () yahoo com
Date: 29 Apr 2006 20:21:44 -0000
I believe besides the more obvious (commercial grade is richer with attacks and more developed GUI), in short the
biggest functional difference between Metasploit and Canvas/Core is the ability to use "syscall proxies" that Core
Impact I beleive originally developed that overcomes limitation of pre-packaged payloads. This is described in detail
by Maximiliano Cáceres from Core. I have not personally used Canvas yet, but know that Dave Aitel developed this
capability in MOSDEF (free) as well as Canvas.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|