Home page logo
/

pen-test logo Penetration Testing mailing list archives

[Fwd: Re: Pentester convicted..]
From: William Hancock <bill.hancock () isthmusgroup com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:34 -0500

The below message was intended for the list, I am forwarding it on at
their request.

bh

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Pentester convicted..
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2006 14:20:01 +1000
From:   Serg B. <sergicles () gmail com>
To:     pen-test () lists securityfocus com
CC:     bill.hancock () isthmusgroup com
References:     <4461F6A6.9050501 () isthmusgroup com>



That's a nice rant and I gree with you on most points (horrible wallet
analogy though hehe).

Any way, you neglected or perhaps didn't read the part where he emailed
database records to the site administrator as proof or v ulnerability.

He compromised the database and accessed personal data. This in tern will be
followed by weeks or possibly months of auditing and
recovery/reinstallations, etc.

Understandable, they are a little pissed!

But yeah, this is definitely a major step backwards. It is in no way going
to deter people from exploiting or at least attempting to exploit services
that look like they are vaulnarable, they are just going to stop reporting
it.

Total Bullshit! As my colleague just pointed out: this is an example case of
head in the sand mentality! Rant justified!

On 11/05/06, William Hancock <bill.hancock () isthmusgroup com> wrote:

Hey there pen-testers, take this with a grain of salt, it just got me
excited.  I am really interested in everyones opinion on the matter or
corporate responsibility and ownership.

<RANT>
In an article posted to slashdot today
(http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/10/112259&from=rss) a man
has been convicted of hacking when he casually and helpfully reported a
security vulnerability to the owners of a web site, in this case The
University of Southern California.  It reads like it was some sort of
simple SQL injection and upon gleaning the information he reported it.

What are we to do as a community I ask?  We should we, the good guys,
who are paid for our knowledge and ability to exploit mistakes,
oversights, and weaknesses then professionally report them to aid in the
securing of information capital (or anyone who reports the flaw for that
matter) worry about prosecution.  It lends itself to a forcing the
technical community to sit on their laurels and wait for the people who
don't report issues to exploit them.  Further it sounds very clear that
had he not notified them, they would have never known.

A security pro notices a flaw, checks to make sure he is not on crack by
'flipping a bit', deems the threat viable and is likely to be exploited,
notifies the owners, then get arrested and charged with unauthorized
access.  We, as a or even The security community, should push
corporations, governments, and organized body's to take responsibility
and ownership of their problems.  If they publish a site that is flawed
or exposing information then they are authorizing the retrieval of that
information.  I'm not advocating that they laws should allow any jerk to
try and brute his or her way in to a public or private web site, but
come on.

If someone leaves their wallet in the park with no guard or protection,
I pick it up and bring it back to the owner, the owner didn't want me to
have it but I brought it back to him.  Why in the hell should I have to
go to jail for returning it to him, why should I/we be punished for
doing the right thing?

I acknowledge this to be a rant but there must but some way to insist
that when people make something available to the public that it is their
responsibility to safeguard it and appreciate not persecute someone who
let's them know (for free I might add) that a weakness exists.  This is
simple scapegoating, the University did something not advisable as a
good practice and instead of owning up to it they villafied a
professional pen-tester for offering valid advice.

</RANT>


Thanks,
Bill


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the
Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to
rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has
the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with
a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security? 
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's 
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, 
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the 
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration 
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a 
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software 
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can 
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php 
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your 
results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]