|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: Opinions of automated testers
From: Joey Peloquin <joeyp () cotse net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:53:43 -0500
Benny Tsai wrote:
Another option is setting up WebGoat as a pen-test playground:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_WebGoat_Project
-Benny
Webgoat is absolutely terrible for evaluating automated scanners. It's
intended as a training tool, not an evaluation platform (for now, at least).
If you rely on it alone, you won't be happy with any scanner on the market.
Other than SPI and Cenzic's test sites, I'd take the advice of our other
peers that have recommended the Hacme* line of test apps. If you're savvy,
you could also try to get your own running with the OWASP SiteGenerator
[http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Owasp_SiteGenerator].
Good luck!
-jp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Opinions of automated testers Dotzero (May 08)
|