Penetration Testing: RE: Dangerous in using nmap for AS/400 730 machine configured with 3 ASPs?

["Brahnda A. Eleazar" <brahnda.e () hermisconsulting com>]

Peace all,

Many thanks for your comments...

For those of you bet on the IP stack problem, you win :)
We redid the scan last weekend to make sure of this.

The problem is more of the limitation of the OS/machine being scanned.
> From all the AS/400 machines being scanned, only the 730 machine was seriously affected by nmap probes.
It automatically assign a user for the TCP/IP connection and started numerous jobs (which had to be manually ended for 
them to stop).
The rest of them didn't have this problem -- newer machines and OS-es.

I agree with Jon that networking in this AS/400 is much more like an add-on after thought :)
And it's pure luck in my opinion that no one before this brought the machine down (they have a team which also does 
ports scanning to their production servers, including this problematic one).
Oh well, at least I learned something new =)

Thanks and Regards,
=adley=

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Zhong [mailto:sagiko () gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:50 PM
To: Brahnda A. Eleazar
Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Dangerous in using nmap for AS/400 730 machine configured with 3 ASPs?

I will put my bet on the crash of IP stacks as well. Those systems
just can't handle the nmap probing packats properly. A very common
scenario is the systems open connections and allocate resources, but
fail to close them properly. I encountered these cases not only on
AS400, some old solaris OS also have similar issues.

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Brahnda A. Eleazar
<brahnda.e () hermisconsulting com> wrote:
> Peace all,
>
> I am wondering whether this is related or not.
> I was in the middle of beginning a pentest activity for a network segment containing quite a number of AS400 
> (Production).
> I started with a simple nmap first to see what I am facing.
> My command was (IPs are masked) "nmap -sV -vv -p 8470-8476 -o firsttry_port.nmap xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24"
> This lasted for about 15 minutes.
>
> After about 2 hours later, 2 out of 50+ identifiable machines started having problems.
> They became very slow.
> Those two machines are using ASP (Auxiliary Storage Pools), 1 ASP on the 1st machine and 2 ASPs on the 2nd.
>
> I just want to get more information whether my nmap did anything "bad"? :)
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> =adley=
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Top 5 Common Mistakes
> in Securing Web Applications
> Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides
>
> www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Top 5 Common Mistakes
in Securing Web Applications
Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides

www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
------------------------------------------------------------------------