|
Penetration Testing
mailing list archives
Re: Dangerous in using nmap for AS/400 730 machine configured with 3 ASPs?
From: pand0ra <pand0ra.usa () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:08:16 -0600
I think there is a PTP out there that talks about that issue. Some
version of the 400 are vulnerable to a DoS from a normal port scan.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Brahnda A. Eleazar
<brahnda.e () hermisconsulting com> wrote:
Peace all,
I am wondering whether this is related or not.
I was in the middle of beginning a pentest activity for a network segment containing quite a number of AS400
(Production).
I started with a simple nmap first to see what I am facing.
My command was (IPs are masked) "nmap -sV -vv -p 8470-8476 -o firsttry_port.nmap xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24"
This lasted for about 15 minutes.
After about 2 hours later, 2 out of 50+ identifiable machines started having problems.
They became very slow.
Those two machines are using ASP (Auxiliary Storage Pools), 1 ASP on the 1st machine and 2 ASPs on the 2nd.
I just want to get more information whether my nmap did anything "bad"? :)
Thanks and Regards,
=adley=
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Top 5 Common Mistakes
in Securing Web Applications
Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides
www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Top 5 Common Mistakes
in Securing Web Applications
Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides
www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: username and Password sent as clear text strings, (continued)
|