|
Politech
mailing list archives
FC: Congressmen spar over police administrative subpoena-snooping bill
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 00:53:48 -0400
[Also Rep. Bill McCollum, hardly a friend of privacy, has been defending it
in the House. --Declan]
http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/10/20/2341243&mode=nested
Congressmen Duel Over Police Snooping Bill
posted by cicero on Friday October 20, @11:31PM
from the with-friends-like-these dept.
Privacy defenders and privacy invaders spent this week sparring
over a bill called the Presidential Threat Protection Act of
2000. Already approved by the Senate, it's set to be voted on by the
House shortly. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the wiretap-happy senator
who likes to pose as an occasional friend of civil liberties, is a
sponsor, as is Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican who's been trying to
buff his image among geeks. Rep. Bob Barr (R-Georgia) may be on a
campaign to ban abortion and indict Democrats, but at least he's
usually a reliable ally when limiting government surveillance; he
opposes the measure. The bill would allow police to obtain records on
you from third parties (think ISP, telephone company) without a search
warrant. It's designed to be used against violent criminals, but it
sets a dangerous precedent. See letters below.
Letters from Barr opposing and McCollum supporting:
http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/10/20/2341243&mode=nested
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact.
To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- FC: Congressmen spar over police administrative subpoena-snooping bill Declan McCullagh (Oct 20)
|