Politech: FC: Ex-PBS and FCC chiefs want $18 billion new agency, WSJ says

[Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>]

I'm not sure why this below article is news. The Grossman-Minow duo were 
highlighted in Gary Chapman's now-discontinued LA Times column on May 5. 
Chapman reported the pair are eager to launch a new federal bureaucracy, a 
"Digital Opportunity Investment Trust, a public agency modeled on the 
National Science Foundation." It'll be paid for with $18 billion in 
spectrum auctions -- money that could have given every American family 
perhaps $100-$200 in tax rebates instead.
Chapman laments that "new developments in online business are creating a 
heightened sense of urgency because many Web-based companies are starting 
to explore 'pay-per-view' or subscription-based fees to maximize the value 
of their intellectual property."
Well, yes. Advertising is in the toilet, so companies are choosing to sell 
content as an alternative to going out of business. Salon is a perfect 
example, and plenty of news articles have described how other formerly-free 
services are trending toward pay services. This is not a pernicious 
development; in fact it has advantages. On pay services, we won't see as 
many ads.
As for this new federal agency, who needs it? There already are more 
"public spaces" on the Net than content to fill them -- I daresay Grossman 
and Minow have never been on Usenet -- and setting up a web server with a 
large hard drive is hardly expensive. If people really want content online, 
the market will respond by producing it. We don't have $18 billion federal 
book, magazine or newspaper projects, but somehow we see splendid writing 
nonetheless.
I talked about this at greater length instead of in midnight-rant form in 
my testimony last year before the Democracy Online Project:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01184.html

-Declan

*********

WHY NOT FUND ONLINE CONTENT?
Lawrence K. Grossman, former president of PBS, and Newton Minow, former FCC 
chief, have proposed what they call a Digital Opportunity Investment Trust, 
which would be a federally chartered agency along the lines of the National 
Science Foundation or the National Institutes of Health. The goal would be 
public funding of online content, focusing on educational and civic uses of 
digital technology. The money ($18 billion), which the backers suggest 
could be taken from spectrum auction revenues, would be used to help build 
worthwhile places to visit in cyberspace: "You could have a virtual solar 
system, a 3D model of the human body or a recreation of Mark Twain's 
America," says Grossman. Minow compares his Digital Promise Project's 
approach to the 19th-century legislation that created land-grant colleges. 
"There's an opportunity to do that again," he says. (Wall Street Journal 23 
Jul 2001)
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB995840737736919399.htm


Democratizing Information
Jun. 3, 2001 07:26 ET
http://www.latimes.com/print/editorials/20010602/t000045934.html

Television, more vast than ever, turns toxic Author of famed '61 quote 
revisits the vast wasteland
May. 10, 2001 04:46 ET
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20010509/3301798s.htm

Paying for Net Foils 'Public Space' Idea
May. 4, 2001 05:57 ET
http://www.latimes.com/print/techtimes/20010503/t000037177.html




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------