Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Politech: FC: Has McAfee sided with FBI on "Magic Lantern" detection?

FC: Has McAfee sided with FBI on "Magic Lantern" detection?

From: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:54:56 -0500

[I hope McAfee will clarify what's going on. Babelfish translates: "Network
Associates speaker Alexander Wegner explained opposite heise on-line, an
appropriate report the Washington post office corresponds not to the
truth..." --Declan]

---
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:35:58 -0800
From: Joachim Feise <jfeise_at_ics.uci.edu>
Organization: University of California, Irvine
To: declan_at_well.com
Subject: Re: FC: McAfee sides with FBI against customers on "Magic Lantern"
Hello Declan,
according to the German news site "Heise Online", Alexander Wegner,
a speaker for NAI (the German branch, I guess) said that the
Washington Post article is wrong:
http://www.ct.heise.de/newsticker/data/wst-26.11.01-001/
He used pretty strong words:
Roughly translated, he said that "NAI doesn't care what the FBI does.
NAI writes software that detects malicious code. If there is a trojan
or virus on the system, it is reported. No exceptions."
Cheers,
-Joachim
---
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:27:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Dildog <dildog_at_l0pht.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Subject: Re: FC: McAfee sides with FBI against customers on "Magic Lantern"
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20011126103849.022698c0_at_mail.well.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0111261223060.2021-100000_at_0nus.l0pht.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-UIDL: d59308e3e0b84af70ff48ea63ca1f968
Heh. I guess once that 'Magic Lantern' software leaks out to the malicious
types, they'll end up using it since virus scanners will never pick it
up... did they even consider the consequences of writing software that was
a state-sanctioned version of Back Orifice?
Perhaps they should consider consulting the Cult Of The Dead Cow,
considering we've had considerably more experience in this arena than they
have...
--dil
---
From: mjinks_at_sysvi.com
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:43:51 -0600
To: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Subject: Re: FC: McAfee sides with FBI against customers on "Magic Lantern"
call me a zealot.
http://www.openantivirus.org/
(no idea if it's any good or not but i'm sure they could use some help)
http://www.gnupg.org/
(use it, like it, there's a win/DOS version)
---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Nov 26 2001
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos