Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Politech: FC: Request for articles for "Civil Liberties and Criminal Defense"

FC: Request for articles for "Civil Liberties and Criminal Defense"

From: Declan McCullagh <declan_at_well.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:06:08 -0500

---
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:22:06 -0800
From: "Jordan" <editor_at_criminaldefense.com>
To: declan_at_well.com
Hello Declan,
On the off chance that your listees might be potential editorial 
contributors to our
'03 debut issue dealing with "Civil Liberties and Criminal Defense," may I 
paste
in our call for contributions? Let me know if there's something you might like
to contribute as well.
Best, Jordan
Dear Friends of the Constitution!
We very much share your concerns about the shredding of the Constitution 
and the increasingly
unfortunate nature of the diminishment of civil liberties (and criminal 
defense) under the guise of the war
against terrorism.
—How on earth have we reached a point at which two American citizens can be 
held incommunicado without
right to an attorney? Or the right to know the evidence against them?
—How is that an American attorney (Lynne Stewart) is facing 40 years in 
prison for "providing material support
to terrorists," by merely defending the interests of her client, who is in 
prison, and with whom all her conversations
have been monitored by the Dept. of Justice? WHAT IS HAPPENING TO 
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE?
—Are the lower courts often defending the Constitution, while the higher 
courts are more often siding with the Justice Dept
(as legal writer Jennifer Van Bergen found in an article published in 
CriminalDefense Weekly and truthout.org)?
—What prevents the "terrorist" provisions of the PATRIOT and/or Homeland 
Security Act(s) from rolling over (eventually)
to random criminal felons? Just as California's "three strikes" legislation 
was voted in as strict punishment against three "serious
and violent felonies," but later prosecutors were making the third strike 
merely a "serious" felony, opting at times
to make wobblers like shoplifting the third strike—just as we saw that kind 
of abuse on the government side,
what would stop federal officials from taking advantage of these 
anti-terrorist provisions and applying similar
methods and punishments to American felons?
Is there a feature article, a how-to, or an op-ed column you would like to 
write for our "Civil Liberties and Criminal Defense" forum
due out January 15? Please consider this and let me know. Deadline for 
receipt is Friday, Jan. 3.
Best, Jordan
Jordan Elgrably, Editor
CriminalDefense.com
Publishers of CriminalDefense Weekly (1st & 15th of the month)
and CriminalDefense Review (Quarterly digest of CriminalDefense Weekly)
"Crime, Punishment and the Constitution"
818/461-0937 ph.
818/461-0939 fx.
editor_at_criminaldefense.com
12400 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 378
Studio City, CA 91604
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q%declan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Dec 13 2002
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos