Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




Politech mailing list archives

Stu Baker: Congress did not just outlaw inbound spam filtering
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:42:41 -0500

----

From: "sbaker () steptoe com" <sbaker () steptoe com>
To: "'Declan McCullagh'" <declan () well com>
cc: "Albertazzie, Sally" <SAlbertazzie () steptoe com>
Subject: RE: [Politech] Did Congress just make inbound spam filtering illegal? [sp]
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:02:15 -0500

I think Al is wrong.  The opt-out address does not need to be the same as
the sender's personal corporate email address.  In fact, no one will do it
that way.  The opt-out address can easily be set up separately from other
corporate addresses that are filtered (optout () hotmail com).  Or the opt-out
can be done on a website.  Either way, regular inbound spam filtering on
regular mail accounts can continue uninterrupted.
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Stu Baker: Congress did not just outlaw inbound spam filtering Declan McCullagh (Dec 08)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]