|
Politech
mailing list archives
FC: Eric Drexler on nanotechnology warnings, "nightmare dreams"
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 01:34:30 -0400
[A little late but worth it. --DBM]
---
http://www.foresight.org/NanoRev/Letter.html
Drexler writes Smalley open letter on assemblers
Posted on Nanodot, April 20, 2003
Foresight Chairman K. Eric Drexler has sent Nobel laureate Richard
Smalley an open letter to rebut Smalley's statements that molecular
assemblers are not possible. The letter was also sent directly to
several dozen leading researchers, decision makers, and journalists in
the field. Reportedly Prof. Smalley has promised a response.
Drexler wrote to Smalley:
Prof. Smalley:
I have written this open letter to correct your public
misrepresentation of my work.
As you know, I introduced the term "nanotechnology" in the
mid-1980s to describe advanced capabilities based on molecular
assemblers: proposed devices able to guide chemical reactions by
positioning reactive molecules with atomic precision. Since
"nanotechnology" is now used label diverse current activities, I
have attempted to minimize confusion by relabelling the longer term
goal "molecular manufacturing". The consequences of molecular
manufacturing are widely understood to be enormous, posing
opportunities and dangers of first-rank importance to the long-term
security of the United States and the world. Theoretical studies of
its implementation and capabilities are therefore of more than
academic interest, and are akin to pre-Sputnik studies of
spaceflight, or to pre-Manhattan-Project calculations regarding
nuclear chain reactions.
You have attempted to dismiss my work in this field by
misrepresenting it. From what I hear of a press conference at the
recent NNI conference, you continue to do so. In particular, you
have described molecular assemblers as having multiple "fingers"
that manipulate individual atoms and suffer from so-called "fat
finger" and "sticky finger" problems, and you have dismissed their
feasibility on this basis [1]. I find this puzzling because, like
enzymes and ribosomes, proposed assemblers neither have nor need
these "Smalley fingers" [2]. The task of positioning reactive
molecules simply doesn't require them.
I have a twenty year history of technical publications in this area
[3 - 12] and consistently describe systems quite unlike the straw
man you attack. My proposal is, and always has been, to guide the
chemical synthesis of complex structures by mechanically
positioning reactive molecules, not by manipulating individual
atoms. This proposal has been defended successfully again and
again, in journal articles, in my MIT doctoral thesis, and before
scientific audiences around the world. It rests on well-established
The impossibility of "Smalley fingers" has raised no concern in the
research community because these fingers solve no problems and thus
appear in no proposals. Your reliance on this straw-man attack
might lead a thoughtful observer to suspect that no one has
identified a valid criticism of my work. For this I should,
perhaps, thank you.
You apparently fear that my warnings of long-term dangers [13] will
hinder funding of current research, stating that "We should not let
this fuzzy-minded nightmare dream scare us away from
nanotechnology....NNI should go forward" [14]. However, I have from
the beginning argued that the potential for abuse of advanced
nanotechnologies makes vigorous research by the U.S and its allies
imperative [13]. Many have found these arguments persuasive. In an
open discussion, I believe they will prevail. In contrast, your
attempt to calm the public through false claims of impossibility
will inevitably fail, placing your colleagues at risk of a
destructive backlash.
Your misdirected arguments have needlessly confused public
discussion of genuine long-term security concerns. If you value the
accuracy of information used in decisions of importance to national
and global security, I urge you to seek some way to help set the
record straight. Endorsing calls for an independent scientific
review of molecular manufacturing concepts [15] would be
constructive.
A scientist whose research I respect has observed that "when a
scientist says something is possible, they're probably
underestimating how long it will take. But if they say it's
impossible, they're probably wrong." The scientist quoted is, of
course, yourself [16].
K. Eric Drexler Chairman, Foresight Institute
----------------------------
1. Smalley, R. E. (2001) Of chemistry, love and nanobots - How soon
will we see the nanometer-scale robots envisaged by K. Eric Drexler
and other molecular nanotechologists? The simple answer is never.
Scientific American, September, 68-69.
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~smalleyg/rick's%20publications/SA285-76.pd
f
2. Drexler, K. E., D. Forrest, R. A. Freitas Jr., J. S. Hall, N.
Jacobstein, T. McKendree, R. Merkle, C. Peterson (2001) A Debate
About Assemblers. http://www.imm.org/SciAmDebate2/smalley.html.
3. Drexler, K. E. (1981) Molecular engineering: An approach to the
development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation.
Proc. Natnl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 78:5275-5278.
http://www.imm.org/PNAS.html
4. Drexler, K. E. (1987) Nanomachinery: Atomically precise gears
and bearings. IEEE Micro Robots and Teleoperators Workshop.
Hyannis, Massachusetts: IEEE.
5. Drexler, K. E., and J. S. Foster. (1990) Synthetic tips. Nature.
343:600.
6. Drexler, K. E. (1991) Molecular tip arrays for molecular imaging
and nanofabrication. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology-B.
9:1394-1397.
7. Drexler K. E., (1991) Molecular Machinery and Manufacturing with
Applications to Computation. MIT doctoral thesis.
8. Drexler, K. E. (1992) Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery,
Manufacturing, and Computation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
http://www.foresight.org/NanoRev/Bookstore.html#anchor1025139
9. Drexler, K. E. (1992) Molecular Directions in Nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology (2:113).
10. Drexler, K. E. (1994) Molecular machines: physical principles
and implementation strategies. Annual Review of Biophysics and
Biomolecular Structure (23:337-405).
11. Drexler, K. E. (1995) Molecular manufacturing: perspectives on
the ultimate limits of fabrication. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A
(353:323-331).
12. Drexler, K. E. (1999) Building molecular machine systems.
Trends in Biotechnology, 17: 5-7.
http://www.imm.org/Reports/Rep008.html
13. Drexler, K. E. (1986) Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of
Nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
http://www.foresight.org/EOC/index.html
14. Smalley, R. E. (2000) quoted in: W. Schulz, Crafting A National
Nanotechnology Effort. Chemical & Engineering News, October 16.
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/nanotechnology/7842/7842government.html
15. Peterson, C. L. Testimony before the Committee on Science, U.S.
House of Representatives, 9 April 2003.
http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/apr09/peterson.htm
16. Smalley, R. E. (2000) quoted in N. Thompson, Downsizing:
Nanotechnology---Why you should sweat the small stuff . The
Washington Monthly Online, October.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2000/0010.thompson.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- FC: Eric Drexler on nanotechnology warnings, "nightmare dreams" Declan McCullagh (Jun 25)
|